Tell Me About a Time You Had a Conflict With a Coworker: The SOAR Method for Answering This High-Stakes Behavioral Question
Tell Me About a Time You Had a Conflict With a Coworker: The SOAR Method for Answering This High-Stakes Behavioral Question
Picture this: You’re sailing through your interview, confidently answering questions about your skills and experience. Then, the interviewer leans forward slightly and asks, “Tell me about a time you had a conflict with a coworker and how you resolved it.”
Your heart skips a beat. Say too much, and you might come across as difficult to work with. Say too little, and you appear evasive. Share the wrong example, and you could talk yourself right out of a job offer.
Conflict-related behavioral questions are among the most challenging and common interview questions you’ll face. According to research from Psychology Today, a staggering 85% of employees deal with conflict at some level, with 29% facing it almost constantly. No wonder hiring managers want to know how you handle workplace disagreements!
But here’s the good news: With the right approach, this high-stakes question becomes an opportunity to showcase your emotional intelligence, problem-solving abilities, and interpersonal skills. That’s exactly what we’ll help you do today.
By the end of this article, you’ll have a powerful framework for answering this tricky question with confidence, plus examples you can customize for your specific situation. Instead of dreading this question, you’ll be ready to impress interviewers with your mature, thoughtful approach to workplace conflict.
☑️ Key Takeaways
- Use the SOAR framework (Situation, Obstacle, Action, Results) to structure your conflict resolution story clearly and concisely.
- Focus on demonstrating emotional intelligence by showing how you understood multiple perspectives and managed your own reactions professionally.
- Never speak negatively about the other person involved in the conflict – this is the #1 red flag that concerns interviewers.
- End with specific positive outcomes and lessons learned to transform your conflict story into a powerful example of your problem-solving abilities
Why Interviewers Ask About Workplace Conflict
Before we dive into our framework, let’s understand what hiring managers are really looking for when they ask about workplace conflicts. This isn’t just a random question – it’s a strategic probe designed to reveal key aspects of your professional character.
When interviewers ask about conflict, they’re evaluating three critical qualities:
- Your emotional intelligence and self-awareness. Do you recognize your role in conflicts? Can you manage your emotions in tense situations?
- Your communication skills under pressure. Can you express disagreements professionally without burning bridges?
- Your problem-solving approach. Do you focus on solutions rather than dwelling on problems?
These questions reveal far more about your interpersonal skills than almost any other interview question. They show whether you’re someone who can navigate the inevitable frictions of workplace relationships without creating a toxic environment.
Red flags that immediately disqualify candidates include:
- Blaming others completely for conflicts
- Speaking negatively about former colleagues
- Showing no self-awareness about your contribution
- Having no conflict resolution strategy
- Claiming you’ve never experienced workplace conflict
As workplace psychology expert Aldo Civico notes in Psychology Today, how we approach conflict makes all the difference in workplace outcomes. Interviewers know this, which is why they’re carefully evaluating your conflict resolution skills.
Interview Guys Tip: Avoid the common mistake of thinking this question is about the conflict itself. It’s actually about how you handle difficult situations. The conflict is just the backdrop – your response process is the true star of your answer.
The SOAR Method: A Powerful Framework for Conflict Questions
To help you craft the perfect response to this challenging question, we recommend using the SOAR method – a concise, powerful framework that structures your answer while highlighting your conflict resolution skills.
Much like our other interview answer templates, this framework provides a reliable structure that ensures you cover all the essential elements while avoiding common pitfalls.
Here’s what SOAR stands for:
- S – Situation: Briefly describe the conflict context
- O – Obstacle: Explain the specific challenge or disagreement
- A – Action: Detail the steps you took to resolve the conflict
- R – Results: Share the positive outcomes and lessons learned
This streamlined framework gives you three major advantages over typical rambling conflict responses:
- It keeps your answer focused and concise (crucial for behavioral questions)
- It ensures you highlight both your actions AND the positive results
- It naturally guides you toward a positive conclusion with valuable takeaways
Now, let’s break down each component of the SOAR method and see how to apply it effectively.
Mastering the SOAR Method Step-by-Step
S – Situation
Start by briefly setting the scene with just enough context for the interviewer to understand the circumstances. Keep this part concise – it should be no more than 2-3 sentences.
- Strong Example: “While managing a critical product launch at my previous company, I worked closely with a colleague from the marketing department on developing the go-to-market strategy. We had a six-week timeline and shared responsibility for the deliverables.”
- Weak Example: “My coworker and I never got along from day one. She was always difficult to work with and seemed to disagree with everything I suggested, which made the whole project a nightmare from start to finish.”
Notice how the strong example neutrally describes the situation without characterizing the other person negatively. It provides clear context without unnecessary details.
Interview Guys Tip: When describing the situation, avoid using emotionally charged language or making judgments about the other person’s character. Stick to objective facts that set the scene for the conflict.
O – Obstacle
Next, clearly articulate the specific conflict or challenge you faced. This is where you explain the disagreement without assigning blame. Focus on the differing perspectives rather than personal clashes.
- Strong Example: “We disagreed fundamentally on the campaign timeline. I believed we needed to build in additional time for customer testing before launch, while my colleague wanted to move more aggressively to meet quarterly targets. This created tension as we tried to finalize the project plan.”
- Weak Example: “My coworker was unreasonable and kept pushing for an unrealistic timeline that would have compromised the quality of our work. She didn’t care about doing things right, only about looking good to management.”
The strong example presents both perspectives fairly and focuses on the professional disagreement rather than personal attacks.
A – Action
This is the heart of your answer, where you describe the specific steps you took to address and resolve the conflict. This section should demonstrate your emotional intelligence, communication skills, and problem-solving abilities.
When describing your actions, include these key elements:
- How you initiated a constructive conversation
- How you demonstrated understanding of the other person’s perspective
- The compromise or solution you proposed
- Any additional steps you took to repair the relationship
Strong Example: “First, I suggested we meet privately to discuss our different perspectives rather than continuing to disagree in team meetings. During our conversation, I actively listened to understand the pressure she was under to meet quarterly goals. I acknowledged those constraints and then explained my concerns about rushing the customer testing phase.
Instead of insisting on my original timeline, I proposed a compromise where we could streamline certain review processes while preserving the essential customer feedback phase. I also suggested we jointly present this approach to our manager to ensure alignment.
Throughout the process, I focused on maintaining a positive working relationship by emphasizing our shared goal of a successful product launch.”
This action section shows maturity in addressing the conflict directly, seeking to understand the other perspective, and working toward a solution that addressed both sets of concerns. It demonstrates key conflict resolution skills that employers value, as discussed in our article on building your behavioral interview story.
R – Results
Finally, conclude with the positive outcomes that resulted from your conflict resolution approach. This should include both tangible business results and improvements in the working relationship. Where possible, include specific metrics or achievements.
Also, share what you learned from the experience – this demonstrates growth and self-reflection, qualities that interviewers highly value.
More importantly, our working relationship actually strengthened through this process. We continued to collaborate effectively on subsequent projects, with a better understanding of each other’s priorities. I learned the importance of addressing conflicts directly but respectfully, and how finding common ground can lead to better solutions than either person might develop alone.”
The results section transforms what could be a negative story about conflict into a positive story about problem-solving, collaboration, and growth. According to advice from Harvard Business Review’s article on navigating workplace conflict, this approach of finding mutual gains rather than just compromising creates more value for everyone involved.
3 Perfect Example Answers Using the SOAR Method
Now that you understand the framework, let’s see it in action with three sample answers for different career levels and situations.
Example 1: Entry-Level Position Conflict
Situation: “During my marketing internship last summer, I was assigned to work with another intern on developing social media content for a new product line. We had four weeks to create and schedule the content calendar.”
Obstacle: “We disagreed on the approach for the campaign. I thought we should focus on creating fewer, high-quality posts with professional graphics, while my colleague wanted to produce more frequent, casual content. Our disagreement was creating delays as we couldn’t agree on a direction.”
Action: “I suggested we take a step back and review the project brief together to clarify the objectives. This helped us realize that we were both focused on different but valuable aspects of the campaign. Instead of pushing my preference, I proposed we develop a balanced content mix that incorporated both approaches.
I also suggested we create sample posts in both styles and ask our supervisor for feedback before proceeding. This shifted our dynamic from opposition to collaboration as we worked together to present both options.”
Results: “Our supervisor appreciated our initiative and thoughtfulness, and actually preferred the mixed approach we developed over either original concept. The campaign ended up generating 30% higher engagement than previous product launches, and our collaborative solution was noted in my internship evaluation.
This experience taught me the value of stepping back from disagreements to reconsider the ultimate objectives and how different approaches might complement rather than compete with each other. It’s a lesson that’s served me well in collaborative projects since then.”
Example 2: Management-Level Conflict
Situation: “As a project manager at my previous company, I managed a cross-functional team developing a new customer service platform. One of my team members was a senior developer who had been with the company for over ten years.”
Obstacle: “We clashed over the implementation timeline. Based on my experience with similar projects, I had established a 12-week development schedule with specific milestones. The senior developer publicly challenged this timeline in team meetings, insisting it was impossible and suggesting I didn’t understand the technical complexities involved.”
Action: “Rather than dismissing his concerns or engaging in a public disagreement, I scheduled a private meeting to better understand his perspective. I asked him to walk me through the technical challenges he anticipated and listened carefully without interrupting.
I acknowledged his expertise and the valid points he raised, then explained my reasoning behind the original timeline, including business commitments that had been made. Instead of imposing my timeline, I asked for his input on how we might adjust the scope or approach to meet the essential deadlines.
Together, we identified several process improvements and features that could be deprioritized to the next release. I also arranged for additional resources to support his team through the critical development phases.”
Results: “The revised plan allowed us to launch the core functionality on time while deferring some secondary features to a follow-up release. The senior developer became one of the project’s strongest advocates, and his team delivered excellent work.
Perhaps more importantly, this experience transformed our working relationship. He later told me he appreciated being heard and having his expertise respected. For subsequent projects, he became one of my most trusted advisors on technical feasibility.
I learned that when managing experienced specialists, it’s crucial to involve them in planning rather than presenting them with finalized decisions. This approach has helped me build stronger relationships with technical team members and develop more realistic project plans.”
Example 3: Remote Work Conflict
Situation: “Last year, while working remotely, I collaborated with a teammate on revamping our company’s customer onboarding process. We were both working from home but in different time zones – I was on the East Coast while she was on the West Coast.”
Obstacle: “Our conflict centered around communication styles and availability. I preferred structured check-ins at scheduled times, while she operated more flexibly and would send messages throughout the day expecting quick responses. This created tension as I felt constantly interrupted, while she felt I was unresponsive.”
Action: “After a particularly frustrating week, I realized we needed to address this directly. I sent an email acknowledging the challenge and suggesting we discuss how to better work together. During our video call, I focused first on understanding her workflow needs rather than just explaining mine.
I learned she was dealing with childcare responsibilities that made her work schedule unpredictable. With this understanding, we developed communication guidelines that worked for both of us – scheduled focus blocks where interruptions would be minimal, dedicated response times for urgent matters, and a shared document to track questions that didn’t need immediate attention.
I also suggested using project management software to make our progress and blockers visible without requiring constant check-ins.”
Results: “Our new communication system dramatically improved our collaboration. The project was completed on schedule, and our onboarding redesign reduced new customer setup time by 40%.
The experience taught me to look beyond the surface behavior to understand the underlying needs driving different work styles, especially in remote environments. Rather than seeing it as a personality clash, I recognized it as a systems problem that needed a mutually beneficial solution.
This approach has since helped me collaborate effectively with team members across multiple time zones and with different work constraints. I’ve become much more adaptable in my communication style while still maintaining productivity.”
What NOT to Say: Conflict Response Red Flags
Now that you know what makes a great answer, let’s examine the responses that can immediately take you out of the running for a position. Avoid these red flags at all costs:
Never speak negatively about the other person. Saying things like “she was impossible to work with” or “he just wouldn’t listen to reason” reflects poorly on your professionalism and suggests you might badmouth current colleagues too.
Don’t claim you’ve never had workplace conflict. This appears either dishonest or shows a concerning lack of self-awareness. Every workplace has conflicts; employers want to know how you handle them, not whether you’ve had them.
Avoid language that suggests you’re conflict-averse. Phrases like “I just let it go” or “I didn’t want to rock the boat” suggest you let problems fester rather than addressing them constructively.
Don’t focus solely on winning the argument. Statements like “I proved I was right” or “they eventually had to admit I was correct” suggest you care more about being right than team harmony or organizational goals.
Never imply the conflict wasn’t resolved. Leaving the story without resolution suggests you lack conflict resolution skills or hold grudges – both major red flags for employers.
The best conflict responses are balanced, showing your ability to see multiple perspectives while taking appropriate action to resolve issues professionally. They focus on solutions rather than problems and demonstrate your commitment to workplace harmony without sacrificing quality or results.
Interview Guys Tip: When practicing your conflict response, record yourself and listen for any subtle negative language about the other person. Even small cues like tone shifts or dismissive phrasing can signal to interviewers that you might be difficult to work with.
Conclusion and Next Steps
Answering questions about workplace conflict can be challenging, but with the SOAR framework, you now have a powerful tool to structure compelling, mature responses that showcase your interpersonal skills and problem-solving abilities.
Remember, conflict questions aren’t designed to trip you up – they’re opportunities to demonstrate your emotional intelligence, communication skills, and solution-oriented mindset. In fact, your conflict response might be what separates you from equally qualified candidates.
To prepare for your next interview:
- Identify 2-3 workplace conflicts from your experience
- Apply the SOAR framework to structure your stories
- Practice your responses aloud, timing them to ensure they’re concise (aim for 1-2 minutes)
- Prepare for follow-up questions like “What would you do differently now?”
With preparation and the right structure, you can transform this challenging question from a source of interview anxiety into one of your strongest moments.
Related Resources
Want to master more behavioral interview questions? Check out these helpful resources:
- Top 10 Behavioral Interview Questions
- The Psychology of Job Interviews
- The SOAR Method
- Tell Me About a Time You Failed
- Building Your Behavioral Interview Story
Join our email list for more expert interview guidance delivered directly to your inbox.
BY THE INTERVIEW GUYS (JEFF GILLIS & MIKE SIMPSON)
Mike Simpson: The authoritative voice on job interviews and careers, providing practical advice to job seekers around the world for over 12 years.
Jeff Gillis: The technical expert behind The Interview Guys, developing innovative tools and conducting deep research on hiring trends and the job market as a whole.