Ghost Jobs, Ghost Candidates: The Mutual Deception Crisis in Modern Hiring

Picture this: You spend two hours crafting the perfect application for what seems like your dream job. The role description matches your skills perfectly, the company culture sounds amazing, and the salary range is exactly what you’re looking for. You submit your carefully tailored resume and cover letter, then wait. And wait. And wait.

Three months later, you see the exact same job posted again. What you didn’t know is that the position never existed in the first place. Meanwhile, your own resume includes a few “creative interpretations” of your experience because, let’s face it, everyone else seems to be doing it.

Welcome to the modern hiring crisis, where both sides are playing a dangerous game of deception.

The mutual deception crisis has reached a tipping point. Four in 10 companies posted fake job listings in 2024, and three in 10 are currently advertising for roles that don’t actually exist, while simultaneously, 64.2% of Americans admit they’ve lied on their resumes.

This isn’t just about a few bad actors. It’s a systemic breakdown where both sides of the hiring equation have incentivized dishonesty, creating a costly cycle of wasted time, mismatched expectations, and eroded trust.

What you’ll discover in this deep dive:

• The shocking scale of ghost jobs and why legitimate companies post them
• How job seekers are fighting back with their own deceptive tactics
• The psychology driving both sides toward dishonesty
• Why AI is making the problem worse, not better
• Practical strategies to navigate this landscape while maintaining your integrity

Before we dive deeper, check out our Ghost Job Detection Checklist to learn how to spot these phantom positions before you waste your time applying.

The Ghost Job Epidemic: When Companies Fake It

The Staggering Statistics

The numbers behind the ghost job phenomenon are genuinely shocking. Among companies that posted ghost jobs in the past year, approximately 26% posted up to three fake job listings, 19% posted five, 19% posted 10, 11% posted 50, 10% posted 25, and 13% posted 75 or more.

Even more concerning, on Greenhouse alone about 18 to 22% of job listings are fake. That means roughly one in five positions you see on major job platforms might not actually exist.

The rate of hires per job posting has essentially halved over the past five years. In 2019, there were eight hires for every 10 job postings. This dramatic shift suggests that either the job market has become incredibly competitive, or companies are posting positions they have no intention of filling.

Why Companies Post Phantom Positions

The motivations behind ghost jobs reveal a troubling shift in employer behavior:

• Employee Manipulation: Companies aim to trick current employees into thinking the business is growing and making an effort to hire more workers to alleviate their workloads. Some aim to trick current employees into thinking that the business is not only growing, but also making an effort to hire more workers and alleviate their existing workloads. In some instances, hiring managers said their goal is to signal to current employees they are replaceable.

• Resume Harvesting: Nearly 60% of companies surveyed said they collected resumes to keep them on file for a later date, with no intention of immediately hiring anyone. This creates massive databases of potential candidates that companies can tap into when real positions eventually open up.

• Market Intelligence: Companies use fake postings to gauge salary expectations, monitor competitor wages, and assess talent availability without committing to actual hiring. Companies post ghost jobs to constantly monitor the availability of such specialists and their salary expectations.

• Budget Theater: Perhaps a particular role is expensive, and the hiring manager has been instructed to hold off until the budget is finalized. The role may require a highly specialized candidate, which could severely limit the pool of qualified candidates. Certain candidates might also still be employed by a competitor, so the hiring manager has been encouraged to continue collecting applications just in case there’s a qualified candidate able to accept the role sooner.

The Business Case for Deception

Shockingly, the practice appears to be working from employers’ perspectives. Nearly 70% of them said posting fake job listings boosted revenue. Sixty-five percent said the job ads had a positive impact on morale, and 77% reported an uptick in productivity among workers.

This success rate explains why the practice continues to spread. When companies see measurable business benefits from posting fake jobs, the ethical considerations often take a backseat to bottom-line results.

Interview Guys Tip: If a job posting has been active for months, offers an unrealistically broad salary range, or the company keeps reposting the same role, these are red flags for a potential ghost job. Trust your instincts and do additional research before investing significant time in your application.

The Interview Charade

The deception often doesn’t stop at posting fake jobs. Almost 40% of companies said they always contacted candidates who applied for the fake roles. Of those companies, 85% said they even interviewed candidates.

Think about the implications here. Companies are spending time and money conducting interviews for positions that will never be filled. This practice wastes everyone’s time and creates false hope for job seekers who invest hours preparing for interviews that were never intended to result in hiring.

Some candidates have reported going through multiple rounds of interviews, including panel interviews and skills assessments, only to eventually learn that the company had decided not to fill the position after all.

For deeper strategies on finding legitimate opportunities, explore our guide on Hidden Job Market Success.

Ghost Candidates: The Job Seeker Rebellion

The Scale of Resume Deception

Job seekers aren’t passive victims in this deception game. A StandOut CV study on fake jobs references and resume lies revealed that 64.2% of Americans have lied on their resumes. 30.8% of them lie about their skills specifically, and 27.4% lie about their ability with specific equipment and software.

A recent report found that 1 in 3 respondents (33%) have admitted to lying on a resume or cover letter. When you factor in those who might not admit to deceptive practices, the real numbers could be even higher.

Common Lies and Their Frequency

The most frequent deceptions include:

Having a mastery of skills they barely use (like Excel or a foreign language): 60% Working at a company longer than they did in order to omit another employer: 50% Having a higher GPA by more than half a point: 49% Holding a director title when the actual role was manager or other equivalent level: 41%

These statistics reveal that resume inflation often involves relatively minor embellishments rather than complete fabrications. Job seekers are typically stretching existing experiences rather than inventing entirely fictional backgrounds.

Beyond Qualifications: Identity Deception

The lies extend beyond professional qualifications. A surprising 9% have lied about their disability status, 7% about their race or ethnicity, and 6% about being a veteran. As one expert noted, “When people feel that honesty puts them at a disadvantage, bending the truth starts to feel like survival.”

About 1 in 5 (19%) job seekers said they’ve faked enthusiasm or pretended to be passionate about a company’s mission. Another 11% said they’ve claimed to “love a fast-paced environment” or falsely claimed to be a team player when they prefer working solo.

The Success of Deception

The troubling reality is that lying often works. Four in ten who lied during the hiring process landed a job because of it, with 64% saying their lies helped them succeed professionally and 25% saying dishonesty landed them a higher salary than they otherwise would’ve gotten.

However, 84.1% of people who accepted a job offer after lying said that they could still complete the general daily tasks of the job with no problems, suggesting that many lies involve inflating existing capabilities rather than fabricating entirely fictional qualifications.

AI-Powered Mass Deception

The rise of AI job application bots has amplified the deception problem. A job seeker used an AI bot called LazyApply to apply for 5,000 positions, resulting in just 5 interviews for a 0.1% success rate. While this “spray and pray” approach saves time, it floods the market with low-quality applications that further degrade the hiring process.

According to a report from TechBullion, manually applying to just 10 jobs can take a candidate more than 3 hours on average. AI bots promise to solve this time problem, but they often create new issues around application quality and authenticity.

Interview Guys Tip: Instead of lying about skills you don’t have, focus on highlighting transferable skills and your ability to learn quickly. Employers often value potential and attitude over perfect qualification matches.

Learn more about what to avoid in our comprehensive guide to Resume Red Flags.

The Psychology Behind the Lies

Why Employers Deceive

Market Pressure and Competition: Specialized positions in IT, such as AI engineers, data scientists, or software developers, require unique skills. Companies post ghost jobs to constantly monitor the availability of such specialists and their salary expectations.

Organizational Psychology: Seven in 10 hiring managers say that they believe the practice is morally acceptable and beneficial for business. More specifically, 43% of hiring managers believe it is definitely acceptable, while 27% think it is probably OK. This normalization of deception suggests a cultural shift in how businesses view ethical hiring practices.

Control and Power Dynamics: Ghost jobs give employers a sense of control in tight labor markets, allowing them to maintain leverage over both current employees and potential candidates. The practice essentially creates artificial scarcity and competition that benefits the employer’s negotiating position.

Why Job Seekers Lie

Survival in Oversaturated Markets: With so many qualified applicants vying for limited opportunities, candidates may feel pressured to embellish their qualifications or exaggerate their experience to stand out.

Fear-Driven Behavior: The fear of being judged as inadequate or not meeting the desired criteria often leads individuals to stretch the truth about their skills and accomplishments. They believe that presenting themselves as more capable than they truly are increases their chances of securing employment.

Competitive Pressure: Workers sometimes feel they need to stretch the truth to meet job market pressures and expectations from prospective employers. In an effort to avoid being overlooked by hiring managers, rank higher with applicant tracking system (ATS) scanners, or be the “perfect fit” for a role, many are resorting to “embellishments” for the sake of staying competitive.

The Vicious Cycle

This mutual deception creates a destructive feedback loop. When employers post fake jobs, job seekers feel compelled to apply more broadly and embellish their qualifications to compete. When job seekers inflate their credentials, employers become more skeptical and implement stricter screening processes, including posting fake jobs to build larger candidate pools.

The longer a job search takes, the more a job seeker may feel frustrated and defeated. As a job search lingers, people may feel compelled to stretch the truth on their resumes.

The result is a hiring ecosystem built on mistrust, where both parties waste enormous amounts of time and energy on interactions that were never genuine from the start.

AI and Automation: Amplifying the Problem

The Bot Wars Begin

The hiring landscape now features an unprecedented arms race between AI-powered job application bots and algorithmic screening systems. Over 75% of large employers in the U.S. now use some form of automation in their hiring process, creating a dynamic where AI bots are interacting with AI recruiters.

This creates a new challenge for job seekers: navigating a system where AI job application bots are interacting with AI-powered recruiters. It’s now a battle of whose algorithm is smarter.

Mass Application Mania

AI job application tools like LazyApply, Smart Applier, and JobCopilot promise to “apply to thousands of jobs automatically” and “submit 10x as many applications with less effort.” While these tools save time, they’re contributing to application inflation that makes genuine hiring more difficult.

The numbers are staggering: Job seekers who apply to 50 positions spend nearly a full work week, over 37 hours filling out repetitive forms. AI job application bots cut this oversight time to just 5-10 minutes per application.

Some users report applying to 100+ positions in just a few days using automation tools. This volume-based approach floods employers with applications from candidates who may have never actually read the job description.

The Quality Problem

The “spray-and-pray” method means sending applications to companies of all types without customization. While this saves time, it leads to generic applications that rarely get responses.

However, newer AI tools are attempting to solve this problem through better personalization. Advanced platforms create detailed candidate “personas” and match them with suitable positions before applying automatically.

The challenge remains that even sophisticated AI can’t replicate genuine human interest and enthusiasm for specific roles and companies.

Employers Fight Back

Companies are responding with their own AI countermeasures, including more sophisticated ATS systems and even posting more ghost jobs to combat application spam. This creates an escalating cycle where technology designed to improve efficiency actually makes the hiring process more complex and less transparent.

Interview Guys Tip: If you use AI job application tools, always review and customize each application before submission. The goal should be quality over quantity, not mass distribution of generic applications.

Learn more about why automation might backfire in our article: Auto-Apply Job Bots Might Feel Smart, But They’re Killing Your Chances.

The Real Cost of Mutual Deception

Wasted Time and Resources

The mutual deception crisis creates massive inefficiencies. The rise of ghost jobs is muddying the jobs report. It’s making it harder for the Fed to make decisions and understand what the labor market looks like.

Job seekers waste countless hours applying for non-existent positions and preparing for interviews that were never meant to result in hiring. Meanwhile, employers spend time and money managing applications from unqualified candidates and conducting sham interviews.

Eroded Trust and Morale

Nearly half (46%) of workers said they feel more pessimistic about their career prospects than they did this time last year. This growing cynicism stems partly from the realization that the hiring process itself has become unreliable.

More than half (53%) of survey respondents said “unnecessarily long applications” are the worst part of job hunting. When combined with the knowledge that many applications are for non-existent jobs, the frustration becomes even more acute.

Market Distortion

Ghost jobs artificially inflate job market statistics, creating false impressions of economic health and hiring demand. This misleads everyone from job seekers to policymakers who rely on employment data to make decisions.

Posting a job description without the intention to immediately start the hiring process inflates the true number of jobs in the market and elongates the job search, much to the frustration of many job seekers.

Long-term Professional Damage

For individuals who lie on resumes and get caught, the consequences can be severe. For 12%, the lie caught up with them — whether that meant a rescinded offer (4%), getting fired (2%), or disciplinary action (5%).

Companies that post fake jobs risk long-term reputational damage and may struggle to attract quality candidates who become aware of their deceptive practices.

Strategies for Honest Navigation

For Job Seekers: Maintaining Integrity

Spot Ghost Jobs Before You Apply:

• Research jobs that have been posted for unusually long periods
• Be wary of extremely broad salary ranges or vague job descriptions
• Check if the same role is repeatedly posted by the same company
• Look for companies with patterns of job postings that never seem to fill

Build Authentic Applications: Instead of lying about qualifications, focus on honest storytelling that highlights your potential. Frame gaps and weaknesses as growth opportunities rather than fabricating experience you don’t have.

Network Strategically: Up to 85% of jobs are filled via networking. Building genuine professional relationships often bypasses the deceptive online application process entirely.

Verify Company Legitimacy: Before investing significant time in an application, research the company’s recent hiring patterns, employee reviews, and actual business needs.

For Employers: Building Trust

Be Transparent About Hiring Intent: If you’re building a candidate pipeline for future roles, say so explicitly. Candidates appreciate honesty about timeline and probability of actual hiring.

Streamline Your Process: More than half of survey respondents said unnecessarily long applications are the worst part of job hunting. Simplify applications to attract quality candidates while deterring bot spam.

Verify Carefully But Fairly: Implement thorough but respectful verification processes that catch fabrications without creating an adversarial environment for honest candidates.

Set Realistic Expectations: Clearly communicate role requirements, company culture, and growth opportunities without overselling what you can actually provide.

Creating Win-Win Solutions

The best outcomes occur when both parties commit to transparency. Employers who clearly communicate role requirements and realistic timelines attract candidates who can honestly assess their fit. Similarly, candidates who present authentic profiles find better long-term matches.

Focus on cultural fit and potential rather than demanding impossible combinations of experience and skills. Many successful hires come from candidates who had 70-80% of requirements but strong learning ability and cultural alignment.

Interview Guys Tip: Whether you’re hiring or job seeking, remember that successful long-term employment relationships are built on mutual honesty from the very beginning. Short-term gains from deception rarely lead to lasting professional success.

Build genuine connections through our proven Coffee Chat Strategy.

Rebuilding Trust in Hiring

The mutual deception crisis in modern hiring has reached a breaking point where neither side benefits from continued dishonesty. While 44% of Americans admit to lying in the hiring process and 40% of companies post fake job listings, this race to the bottom serves no one’s long-term interests.

The path forward requires collective action: Companies must resist the temptation to post ghost jobs for short-term gains, while job seekers need to build authentic professional narratives rather than fabricated qualifications.

The most successful professionals and organizations will be those who choose transparency over deception, building reputations for honesty that attract genuine opportunities and quality candidates.

Companies that commit to honest hiring practices will differentiate themselves in a market full of deception. Job seekers who focus on authentic skill development and honest self-presentation will build more sustainable, satisfying careers.

The hiring process works best when both sides show up authentically. Instead of playing games with fake jobs and inflated resumes, imagine a world where job seekers could trust that posted positions are real, and employers could rely on honest candidate representations.

Bottom line: In a world full of ghosts, authenticity becomes your greatest competitive advantage. The short-term gains from deception pale in comparison to the long-term benefits of building a reputation for honesty and reliability.

Ready to start fresh? Begin by auditing your own practices, whether you’re hiring or job seeking. Commit to transparency, invest in genuine skill development, and choose quality over quantity in your professional interactions. The hiring process may be broken, but you don’t have to be part of the problem.

---