Myth Busted: New Research Shows 70% of Hiring Decisions Occur AFTER the First 5 Minutes

The Common Myth vs. Reality

You’ve probably heard it before: “Hiring managers make up their minds about candidates in the first 90 seconds.” This intimidating statistic has been widely shared in career advice articles, interview preparation guides, and job-seeking forums. It’s also completely misleading.

A groundbreaking study from researchers at Old Dominion, Florida State, and Clemson Universities examined over 600 real-world job interviews with college and graduate students to reveal a much more nuanced picture of how hiring decisions actually unfold.

Far from the anxiety-inducing “90-second” claim, the comprehensive research found that 69.6% of hiring decisions occurred after the first five minutes of an interview. Only 4.9% of interviewers made their determination within the first minute, and just 25.5% decided within the initial five minutes.

This finding directly contradicts the conventional wisdom that has dominated career advice for years. It suggests job candidates have significantly more time to showcase their qualifications than previously thought – and that a shaky start doesn’t necessarily doom your prospects.

Where The Quick Decision Data DOES Hold Up: The 7-Second Resume Review

While the “90-second interview decision” may be more myth than reality, there is one area of hiring where snap judgments are well-documented: resume screening.

According to credible research from Ladders, Inc. using eye-tracking technology, recruiters spend just 7.4 seconds on average reviewing each resume during initial screening. This finding comes from a methodologically sound study that tracked 30 professional recruiters over a ten-week period, analyzing their visual patterns during resume review.

Unlike the interview decision timeline, which varies widely based on interviewer style and approach, the resume screening process is remarkably consistent and quick across recruiters. The eye-tracking data shows that during those few seconds, recruiters follow a specific pattern:

1. They look first at your current title and company
2. Then move to your previous position and employer
3. Next check dates to ensure steady progression
4. Finally glance at education

This means that while you may have more than 90 seconds to impress during an interview, your resume truly does need to make an impact in just seconds. As we explain in our comprehensive guide, “The 6 Second Resume Test”, understanding exactly what recruiters look for in those critical seconds is essential to creating a resume that advances you to the interview stage.

The contrast is striking: interviews offer significantly more opportunity for recovery and demonstration of your qualifications than the initial resume screen, which remains one of the quickest and most ruthlessly efficient parts of the hiring process.

Where Did the “90-Second Myth” Come From?

The widely circulated 90-second claim appears to have originated from smaller, less rigorous studies conducted in laboratory settings rather than actual hiring environments. These studies often involved artificial scenarios that didn’t accurately reflect real-world hiring practices.

Some career advice websites cite “surveys” of hiring managers without providing details about methodology, sample size, or even when the research was conducted. These unsourced statistics have been repeated so often they’ve taken on the appearance of established fact.

The problem is that such claims create unnecessary anxiety for job seekers while providing little actionable guidance. They also encourage an over-emphasis on superficial first impressions at the expense of substantive preparation.

The Real Timeline of Hiring Decisions

The comprehensive study gives us a much clearer picture of how hiring decisions actually unfold:

• 4.9% of decisions made within the first minute
• 25.5% of decisions made within the first five minutes
• 59.9% of decisions made within the first 15 minutes
• 40.1% of decisions made after the 15-minute mark

While this still suggests that many hiring decisions occur relatively early in the interview process, it’s a far cry from the notion that everything is decided in the first 90 seconds. A majority of decisions (59.9%) were made within the first half of a 30-minute interview, but that still gives candidates substantial time to demonstrate their qualifications.

Even more encouraging for job seekers is the finding that 40.1% of hiring decisions were made in the latter half of interviews – suggesting that sustained, strong performance throughout an interview can overcome any initial hesitations an interviewer might have.

Factors That Influence Decision Speed

The researchers identified several factors that affected how quickly interviewers reached their decisions:

1. Interview Structure

Interviewers who conducted structured interviews – asking each candidate the same predetermined questions in the same order – tended to take more time before making their decisions. This methodical approach allowed for more thorough evaluation and comparison between candidates.

In contrast, interviewers who relied heavily on unstructured conversation and small talk tended to make quicker decisions. This is likely because personal questions elicit stronger immediate reactions but provide less job-relevant information.

2. Interviewer Experience

Counterintuitively, more experienced and confident interviewers often made quicker decisions. This might reflect greater trust in their own judgment or the development of more efficient mental shortcuts based on past hiring experiences.

3. Interview Timing

The study found that being the fourth person interviewed offered candidates the best chance of receiving a full evaluation. Candidates interviewed late in the day or at the end of a long series of interviews faced disadvantages, as interviewer fatigue appeared to lead to faster, potentially less thorough assessments.

Why This Matters For Job Seekers

Understanding the actual timeline of hiring decisions has significant implications for how candidates should approach interviews:

1. First Impressions Matter, But Aren’t Everything

While you should still aim to make a positive initial impression, the study suggests you have more opportunity to recover from early stumbles than conventional wisdom indicates. A momentary awkward pause or nervous response likely won’t sink your chances if you recover well.

2. Preparation Should Be Comprehensive

Rather than focusing exclusively on nailing the first moments of an interview, candidates should prepare for sustained, substantive discussion throughout the entire meeting. Having detailed examples and thoughtful questions ready for the later stages of an interview is crucial.

3. Interview Position Matters

If possible, try to schedule your interview in the middle of the interviewer’s day – not too early and not too late. Being approximately the fourth candidate interviewed appears to offer advantages in terms of receiving a thorough evaluation.

4. Structure Works In Your Favor

Candidates may benefit from subtly helping to structure the interview themselves. By proactively providing specific, job-relevant examples that demonstrate key qualifications, you can help keep the conversation focused on your professional capabilities rather than subjective impressions.

What This Means For Hiring Managers

The research also offers valuable insights for those on the other side of the interview table:

1. Be Aware of Cognitive Biases

The tendency to make quick judgments is natural but potentially detrimental to finding the best candidate. Being conscious of this tendency allows interviewers to deliberately slow down their decision-making process.

2. Implement Structured Interviews

The study suggests that structured interviews not only produce more reliable results but also naturally encourage more thorough candidate evaluation. Having a consistent set of questions for all candidates makes comparisons more meaningful.

3. Schedule Wisely

Be mindful of how interview scheduling may affect your assessments. Taking breaks between interviews and limiting the number of interviews per day can help maintain consistent evaluation quality.

4. Consider Multiple Opinions

Having multiple interviewers evaluate each candidate can help counterbalance individual biases and quick judgments. Different perspectives often lead to more thorough candidate assessment.

The Interview Guys Take

We’ve long been skeptical of the “90-second rule” that’s repeated across so many career advice websites. Our experience coaching thousands of job seekers has shown that interviews are far more dynamic than such rigid timelines suggest. This new research confirms what we’ve observed: while first impressions do matter, they’re only part of a much larger evaluation process.

For job seekers, this is liberating news. It means that interviews are not binary pass/fail tests determined in the opening moments, but rather extended conversations where you have multiple opportunities to demonstrate your value. A candidate who starts nervously but provides thoughtful, substantive responses throughout the interview often outperforms someone who makes a great initial impression but lacks depth.

For hiring managers, this research highlights the importance of structured, thorough evaluation processes. The best hires often emerge from interviews where candidates are given sufficient time to showcase their qualifications and are evaluated based on job-relevant criteria rather than subjective first impressions.

The Bigger Picture: Quality of Hire

Beyond the timeline of decision-making lies an even more important question: Do faster hiring decisions lead to better hires?

Research from Crosschq Data Labs suggests not. Their analysis found that only 9% of interview scores correlate to Quality of Hire – meaning that traditional interview assessments, especially quick judgments, are poor predictors of actual job performance.

Similarly, a Harvard Business Review study found no significant correlation between a candidate’s prior work experience and their performance in a new organization, even when the previous experience seemed directly relevant.

These findings suggest that regardless of when hiring decisions are made during interviews, the entire traditional interview process may be flawed as a selection method. Companies increasingly supplement interviews with skills-based assessments, work samples, and structured evaluation methods to improve hiring outcomes.

Conclusion: A More Balanced Approach

The revelation that most hiring decisions occur well after the first 90 seconds of an interview offers a more realistic and encouraging perspective for job seekers. While making a positive first impression remains important, candidates should prepare for the entire interview process, knowing that they have meaningful time to demonstrate their qualifications.

For hiring managers, this research serves as a reminder of the importance of thorough, structured evaluation processes. By resisting the urge to make snap judgments and deliberately considering multiple aspects of a candidate’s qualifications, interviewers can make more informed decisions that lead to better hires.

In the end, effective interviewing isn’t about speed – it’s about accuracy. And accuracy requires more than just a first impression, no matter how compelling it might seem.

Note: This article draws on research from multiple sources, with the primary data coming from a comprehensive study of over 600 real-world job interviews conducted by researchers from Old Dominion, Florida State, and Clemson Universities.

---